[vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1553717404256{margin-top: 100px !important;margin-bottom: 100px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”1210″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]
On repeated occasions, Eugene Fama has claimed that critics have failed to offer a complete alternative to the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). More specifically, in his Noble speech, Fama said, “Most important, the behavioral literature has not put forth a full blown model for prices and returns that can be tested and potentially rejected – the acid test for any model proposed as a replacement for another model.” Here I argue that Fama’s complaint is too strong.
By Brad Cornell
[/vc_column_text][vc_btn title=”Download PDF” color=”danger” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cornell-capital.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F08%2FAn-Alternative-Hypothesis-to-Market-Efficiency.pdf||target:%20_blank|” css=”.vc_custom_1553717394661{margin-top: 50px !important;}”][/vc_column][/vc_row]